[Home]History of CodeSize/WritingSmallCode

Robo Home | Changes | Preferences | AllPages


Revision 29 . . April 2, 2009 3:47 EST by cpe-75-84-83-181.socal.res.rr.com [ldc < sipush?]
Revision 28 . . March 30, 2009 7:13 EST by Rednaxela [Yep should be small]
Revision 27 . . March 30, 2009 4:28 EST by cpe-75-84-83-181.socal.res.rr.com
Revision 26 . . May 21, 2008 6:28 EST by Starrynte [if...return; ... smaller than if...else..., ]
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Changed: 240c240,242
Yep, that should be the case. Though, that should be equally small as simply going "static double[] stats = new double[BINS];" during the decleration, no reason to have the seperate static block I don't think. -- Rednaxea?
Yep, that should be the case. Though, that should be equally small as simply going "static double[] stats = new double[BINS];" during the decleration, no reason to have the seperate static block I don't think. -- Rednaxela

question: why does ldc take up 1 byte less than sipush (i.e. why does loading 32768 take up one byte less than loading 32767)?

Robo Home | Changes | Preferences | AllPages
Search: