Version | Rating | Notes | |
1.1a | 1772 | Waves tracking limited to live rounds. | Performance varied greatly between the two for many bots, though the ratings averaged out to about the same. |
1.1b | 1770 | Waves tracking not limited to live rounds. | |
1.2a | 1780 | Includes distance to target. | Another case of averaging out. I may have to develop a means of dynamically including or excluding layers. |
1.2b | 1782 | Excludes distance to target. | |
1.3a | 1773 | Includes opponent acceleration. | Very few dramatic differences between performances. |
1.3b | 1768 | Excludes opponent acceleration. | |
1.5a | 1782 | Distance to target increment: 40.0 | Less finely grained distance to target is clearly superior, and also clear is that the segment is one of the more favored. |
1.5b | 1775 | Distance to target increment: 11.0 | |
1.6a | 1818 | Decay Rate: 95% | Not much to say. A very fast decay of visit count stats is not effective. |
1.6b | 1787 | Decay Rate: 80% |
Getting this error from Gemini 1.4a and 1.4b:
pedersen.Gemini 1.4b: Exception: java.lang.NullPointerException java.lang.NullPointerException at pedersen.Gemini.getMovementMethodsMelee(Gemini.java:62) at pedersen.Gemini.init(Gemini.java:40) at pedersen.Gemini.run(Gemini.java:34) at robocode.peer.RobotPeer.run(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613)I'm running Java 1.5 and Robocode 1.1.3. From the scores they've gotten so far (I haven't uploaded any battles), seems like it's not particular to my system... -- Voidious