[Home]History of Narcissus

Robo Home | Changes | Preferences | AllPages


Revision 12 . . February 21, 2004 16:58 EST by PEZ
Revision 11 . . February 21, 2004 16:29 EST by Tango
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Changed: 29c29,31
No. If I had too much time on my hands, I would have volunteered to do it. ;-) I don't think the security manager effects sockets. They are used in the DeathMatchMod?, and I don't think there was any problem, although you may have to use the robocode package to get it to work... If there security isn't a problem, then simply having the grapher (and PEZ is right of course, this would work with any grapher) listen on a particular port (local host), and have the grapher bot send the details of each increment to the GFs, and the grapher can modify the graph. I might give it a go, but no promises. It would take me a while, anyway, because my knowledge of the relevent java is sketchy at best. -- Tango
No. If I had too much time on my hands, I would have volunteered to do it. ;-) I don't think the security manager effects sockets. They are used in the DeathMatchMod?, and I don't think there was any problem, although you may have to use the robocode package to get it to work... If there security isn't a problem, then simply having the grapher (and PEZ is right of course, this would work with any grapher) listen on a particular port (local host), and have the grapher bot send the details of each increment to the GFs, and the grapher can modify the graph. I might give it a go, but no promises. It would take me a while, anyway, because my knowledge of the relevent java is sketchy at best. -- Tango

The DeathMatch mod bypasses the security manager. I'm pretty sure Robocode security will object to using sockets. And I don't think it will like network sockets any better. At least I hope that is so. I don't like the idea that robots running on my machine could start talking on the network. -- PEZ

Robo Home | Changes | Preferences | AllPages
Search: