I'm not sure if I understand what you're asking. Just take the ELO-based function from Paul's website, and substitute robotscore1/robotcodesize1 for robotscore1, and robotscore2/robotcodesize2 for robotscore2. At some point, that means the % of total score for a bot is (botscore/botsize)/(botscore/botsize+enemyscore/enemysize). -- Kawigi |
I'm not sure if I understand what you're asking. Just take the ELO-based function from Paul's website, and substitute robotscore1/robotcodesize1 for robotscore1, and robotscore2/robotcodesize2 for robotscore2. At some point, that means the % of total score for a bot is (botscore/botsize)/(botscore/botsize+enemyscore/enemysize). -- Kawigi Heh, if it were possible to make a bot with 0 in codesize, would have some funny results. Quietus |
Is the formula to adjust the smaller size score 'small bot score' * 'big bot size'/'small bot size' ? -- Albert
I'm not sure if I understand what you're asking. Just take the ELO-based function from Paul's website, and substitute robotscore1/robotcodesize1 for robotscore1, and robotscore2/robotcodesize2 for robotscore2. At some point, that means the % of total score for a bot is (botscore/botsize)/(botscore/botsize+enemyscore/enemysize). -- Kawigi
Heh, if it were possible to make a bot with 0 in codesize, would have some funny results. Quietus