Robo Home | Ugluk | Changes | Preferences | AllPages

Showing revision 14
1.1a1772Waves tracking limited to live rounds.Performance varied greatly between the two for many bots, though the ratings averaged out to about the same.
1.1b1770Waves tracking not limited to live rounds.
1.2a1780Includes distance to target.Another case of averaging out. I may have to develop a means of dynamically including or excluding layers.
1.2b1782Excludes distance to target.
1.3a1773Includes opponent acceleration.Very few dramatic differences between performances.
1.3b1768Excludes opponent acceleration.
1.5a1782Distance to target increment: 40.0Less finely grained distance to target is clearly superior, and also clear is that the segment is one of the more favored.
1.5b1775Distance to target increment: 11.0
1.6a--Decay Rate: 95% 
1.6b--Decay Rate: 80%

Getting this error from Gemini 1.4a and 1.4b:

pedersen.Gemini 1.4b: Exception: java.lang.NullPointerException
    at pedersen.Gemini.getMovementMethodsMelee(Gemini.java:62)
    at pedersen.Gemini.init(Gemini.java:40)
    at pedersen.Gemini.run(Gemini.java:34)
    at robocode.peer.RobotPeer.run(Unknown Source)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613)
I'm running Java 1.5 and Robocode 1.1.3. From the scores they've gotten so far (I haven't uploaded any battles), seems like it's not particular to my system... -- Voidious

Robo Home | Ugluk | Changes | Preferences | AllPages
Edit revision 14 of this page | View other revisions | View current revision
Edited May 23, 2007 19:40 EST by Martin Alan Pedersen (diff)